Gtx 1050 Ti Vs Rtx 2060
GeForce RTX 2060 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Summary
Relative performance
Reasons to consider GeForce RTX 2060 |
| 186% higher gaming performance. |
| This is a much newer product, information technology might have better long term back up. |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports Chiliad-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Supports DirectX Raytracing (DXR) |
| Supports Deep Learning Super-Sampling (DLSS) |
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
| 85 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong betoken if your electric current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce RTX 2060 . |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum functioning penalty) |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Pascal), there may be no operation optimizations for electric current games and applications |
HW Bench recommends GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is the better performing card based on the game benchmark suite used (twoscore combinations of games and resolutions).
Core Configuration
| GeForce RTX 2060 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPU Proper noun | TU106 (TU106-200A-KA-A1) | vs | GP107 (GP107-400-A1) | |
| Fab Procedure | 12 nm | vs | fourteen nm | |
| Die Size | 445 mm² | vs | 132 mm² | |
| Transistors | 10,800 million | vs | 3,300 million | |
| Shaders | 1920 | vs | 768 | |
| Compute Units | 30 | vs | 6 | |
| Core clock | 1365 MHz | vs | 1290 MHz | |
| ROPs | 48 | vs | 32 | |
| TMUs | 120 | vs | 48 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce RTX 2060 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | vs | GDDR5 | |
| Jitney Width | 192 bit | vs | 128 flake | |
| Memory Speed | 1750 MHz 14000 MHz effective | vs | 1752 MHz 7008 MHz constructive | |
| Memory Size | 6144 Mb | vs | 4096 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce RTX 2060 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160 watts | vs | 75 watts | |
| Release Engagement | 15 January 2019 | vs | 25 October 2016 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is ameliorate
GB/s - higher is better
GFLOPs - college is better
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10x64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality TTA DirectX11 Windows10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Highest quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64
FPS (higher is meliorate)
Ultra quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64
FPS (higher is improve)
Ultra Quality, DirectX eleven,Windows 10x64 build 1809
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Max Details, 16:one AF, 2xMSAA
FPS (higher is ameliorate)
Very high quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64
FPS (college is ameliorate)
Ultra detail, xvi:i AF, DirectX12, Windows 10x64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, Hr Textures, DirectX11, Windows 10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Highest Details, Pure hair, HBAO+, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
FPS (college is better)
Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64
FPS (college is amend)
Ultra quality DirectX12 Async Compute Windows10 x64
FPS (higher is ameliorate)
DX11,Max Details, 16:one HQ-AF, +AA
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10x64
FPS (college is better)
Ultra quality TTA DirectX11 Windows10 x64
FPS (college is amend)
Highest quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64
FPS (higher is meliorate)
Ultra quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64
FPS (college is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX 11,Windows 10x64 build 1809
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Max Details, 16:ane AF, 2xMSAA
FPS (college is better)
Very high quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64
FPS (higher is meliorate)
Ultra detail, xvi:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10x64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, Hr Textures, DirectX11, Windows 10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Highest Details, Pure hair, HBAO+, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
FPS (college is better)
Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality DirectX12 Async Compute Windows10 x64
FPS (college is better)
DX11,Max Details, xvi:1 HQ-AF, +AA
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10x64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality TTA DirectX11 Windows10 x64
FPS (higher is meliorate)
Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64
FPS (higher is improve)
Ultra quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64
FPS (higher is improve)
Ultra Quality, DirectX 11,Windows 10x64 build 1809
FPS (college is meliorate)
Very high quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64
FPS (higher is amend)
Ultra detail, 16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10x64
FPS (higher is ameliorate)
Ultra Quality, HR Textures, DirectX11, Windows 10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Highest Details, Pure hair, HBAO+, DirectX12, Windows ten x64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64
FPS (college is better)
Ultra quality DirectX12 Async Compute Windows10 x64
FPS (higher is ameliorate)
DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA
FPS (higher is improve)
Source: https://hwbench.com/vgas/geforce-rtx-2060-vs-geforce-gtx-1050-ti
0 Response to "Gtx 1050 Ti Vs Rtx 2060"
Post a Comment