Nvidia Titan V Vs Rtx 3090

TITAN V vs GeForce RTX 3090

Toll now 561$

Games supported 100%

Price now 1455$

Games supported 100%

General info

Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.

Place in functioning rating	45	five
Value for money	30.59	eighteen.55
Architecture	Volta (2017−2020)	Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code name	GV100	Ampere GA102
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	7 Dec 2017 (iv years ago)	24 September 2020 (1 yr ago)
Launch toll (MSRP)	$2,999	$1,499
Current price	$561 (0.2x MSRP)	$1455 (1x MSRP)

Value for money

To go the alphabetize we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices.

Technical specs

General functioning parameters such equally number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and adding speed. These parameters indirectly speak of operation, but for precise assessment you have to consider their criterion and gaming test results. Note that ability consumption of some graphics cards tin can well exceed their nominal TDP, specially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	5120	10496
Core clock speed	1200 MHz	1400 MHz
Heave clock speed	1455 MHz	1700 MHz
Number of transistors	21,100 1000000	28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	8 nm
Thermal pattern power (TDP)	250 Watt	350 Watt
Texture fill rate	465.6	556.0
Floating-signal functioning	14,899 gflops	no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on compatibility with other reckoner components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and autobus (motherboard compatibility), additional ability connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe iii.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	313 mm
Width	2-slot	three-slot
Supplementary ability connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x viii-pin	1x 12-pivot

Memory

Parameters of retentiveness installed: its blazon, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Notation that GPUs integrated into processors have no defended VRAM and use a shared part of organization RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	24 GB
Retentivity bus width	3072 Scrap	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	1696 MHz	19500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	651.iii GB/s	936.2 GB/s
Shared retentiveness	no data	-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors nowadays on the reviewed GPUs. As a dominion, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA fries). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of sure video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the carte itself.

Brandish Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI	+	+

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	iv.six	4.half-dozen
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	+	1.2
CUDA	vii.0	eight.5

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming criterion performance comparison. Annotation that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.

---

Overall score

This is our combined criterion performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, simply if yous notice some perceived inconsistencies, experience gratuitous to speak up in comments department, we usually fix problems quickly.

• Passmark
• GeekBench 5 OpenCL
• GeekBench 5 Vulkan
• GeekBench 5 CUDA

This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, function of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. Information technology gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation nether various load, providing four split up benchmarks for Direct3D versions ix, x, xi and 12 (the last existence done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Geekbench five is a widespread graphics carte du jour criterion combined from eleven different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU'southward processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Criterion coverage: nine%

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card criterion combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on straight usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API past AMD & Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 5%

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics carte benchmark combined from 11 unlike test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU'south processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Benchmark coverage: 5%

Mining hashrates

Cryptocurrency mining performance of TITAN V and GeForce RTX 3090. Usually measured in megahashes per 2nd.

Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)	79 Mh/southward	no data
Siacoin / SC (Sia)	three.44 Gh/south	no data
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight)	1.45 kh/s	no data
Zcash / ZEC (Equihash)	884 Sol/south	no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how skillful the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming criterion results are measured in FPS.

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games beyond different resolutions:

Full HD	no information	175
1440p	152	135
4K	82	98

Advantages and disadvantages

---

Functioning rating	57.56	89.27
Novelty	7 Dec 2017	24 September 2020
Cost	$2999	$1499
Memory double-decker width	3072	384
Pipelines / CUDA cores	5120	10496
Retentiveness bandwidth	651.3	936.2
Chip lithography	12 nm	8 nm
Thermal design ability (TDP)	250 Watt	350 Watt

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

since information technology shows better operation.

---

Should you all the same have questions concerning selection between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and nosotros shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do yous call up nosotros are correct or mistaken in our pick? Vote by clicking "Like" button well-nigh your favorite graphics card.

---

Competitors of TITAN V by AMD

Nosotros believe that the nearest equivalent to TITAN V from AMD is Radeon RX 5700 XT, which is slower by 1% and lower by four positions in our rating.

Here are some closest AMD rivals to TITAN V:

Competitors of GeForce RTX 3090 by AMD

We believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce RTX 3090 from AMD is Radeon RX 6900 XT, which is slower by 3% and lower past 1 position in our rating.

Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce RTX 3090:

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 100

Similar GPU comparisons

Nosotros selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User rating

Here you tin can see the user rating of the graphics cards, also every bit rate them yourself.

---

Rate NVIDIA TITAN V on a scale of 1 to 5:

Rate NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 on a scale of one to 5:

Questions and comments

Here you can inquire a question most this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.

---

Graphics settings

Screen resolution

FPS

Source: https://technical.city/en/video/TITAN-V-vs-GeForce-RTX-3090

Share this post