banner



Nvidia Titan V Vs Rtx 3090

TITAN V vs GeForce RTX 3090

Toll now 561$

Games supported 100%

Price now 1455$

Games supported 100%

General info

Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.

Place in functioning rating 45 five
Value for money 30.59 eighteen.55
Architecture Volta (2017−2020) Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code name GV100 Ampere GA102
Market segment Desktop Desktop
Release date 7 Dec 2017 (iv years ago) 24 September 2020 (1 yr ago)
Launch toll (MSRP) $2,999 $1,499
Current price $561 (0.2x MSRP) $1455 (1x MSRP)

Value for money

To go the alphabetize we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices.

Technical specs

General functioning parameters such equally number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and adding speed. These parameters indirectly speak of operation, but for precise assessment you have to consider their criterion and gaming test results. Note that ability consumption of some graphics cards tin can well exceed their nominal TDP, specially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores 5120 10496
Core clock speed 1200 MHz 1400 MHz
Heave clock speed 1455 MHz 1700 MHz
Number of transistors 21,100 1000000 28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 8 nm
Thermal pattern power (TDP) 250 Watt 350 Watt
Texture fill rate 465.6 556.0
Floating-signal functioning 14,899 gflops no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on compatibility with other reckoner components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and autobus (motherboard compatibility), additional ability connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface PCIe iii.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16
Length 267 mm 313 mm
Width 2-slot three-slot
Supplementary ability connectors 1x 6-pin + 1x viii-pin 1x 12-pivot

Memory

Parameters of retentiveness installed: its blazon, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Notation that GPUs integrated into processors have no defended VRAM and use a shared part of organization RAM.

Memory type HBM2 GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 24 GB
Retentivity bus width 3072 Scrap 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 1696 MHz 19500 MHz
Memory bandwidth 651.iii GB/s 936.2 GB/s
Shared retentiveness no data -

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors nowadays on the reviewed GPUs. As a dominion, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA fries). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of sure video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the carte itself.

Brandish Connectors 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI + +

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

DirectX 12 (12_1) 12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model 6.4 6.5
OpenGL iv.six 4.half-dozen
OpenCL 1.2 2.0
Vulkan + 1.2
CUDA vii.0 eight.5

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming criterion performance comparison. Annotation that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.


Overall score

This is our combined criterion performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, simply if yous notice some perceived inconsistencies, experience gratuitous to speak up in comments department, we usually fix problems quickly.

  • Passmark
  • GeekBench 5 OpenCL
  • GeekBench 5 Vulkan
  • GeekBench 5 CUDA

This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, function of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. Information technology gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation nether various load, providing four split up benchmarks for Direct3D versions ix, x, xi and 12 (the last existence done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Geekbench five is a widespread graphics carte du jour criterion combined from eleven different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU'southward processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Criterion coverage: nine%

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card criterion combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on straight usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API past AMD & Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 5%

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics carte benchmark combined from 11 unlike test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU'south processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Benchmark coverage: 5%

Mining hashrates

Cryptocurrency mining performance of TITAN V and GeForce RTX 3090. Usually measured in megahashes per 2nd.

Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) 79 Mh/southward no data
Siacoin / SC (Sia) three.44 Gh/south no data
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) 1.45 kh/s no data
Zcash / ZEC (Equihash) 884 Sol/south no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how skillful the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming criterion results are measured in FPS.

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games beyond different resolutions:

Full HD no information 175
1440p 152 135
4K 82 98

Advantages and disadvantages


Functioning rating 57.56 89.27
Novelty 7 Dec 2017 24 September 2020
Cost $2999 $1499
Memory double-decker width 3072 384
Pipelines / CUDA cores 5120 10496
Retentiveness bandwidth 651.3 936.2
Chip lithography 12 nm 8 nm
Thermal design ability (TDP) 250 Watt 350 Watt

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

since information technology shows better operation.


Should you all the same have questions concerning selection between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and nosotros shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do yous call up nosotros are correct or mistaken in our pick? Vote by clicking "Like" button well-nigh your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA TITAN V

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

Competitors of TITAN V by AMD

Nosotros believe that the nearest equivalent to TITAN V from AMD is Radeon RX 5700 XT, which is slower by 1% and lower by four positions in our rating.

Here are some closest AMD rivals to TITAN V:

Competitors of GeForce RTX 3090 by AMD

We believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce RTX 3090 from AMD is Radeon RX 6900 XT, which is slower by 3% and lower past 1 position in our rating.

Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce RTX 3090:

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 100

Similar GPU comparisons

Nosotros selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User rating

Here you tin can see the user rating of the graphics cards, also every bit rate them yourself.


Rate NVIDIA TITAN V on a scale of 1 to 5:

Rate NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 on a scale of one to 5:

Questions and comments

Here you can inquire a question most this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.


Graphics settings

Screen resolution

FPS

Source: https://technical.city/en/video/TITAN-V-vs-GeForce-RTX-3090

0 Response to "Nvidia Titan V Vs Rtx 3090"

Post a Comment

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel